just curious...
so, readers, i invite your input...
which is more emasculating, to be told you have a small penis? or to be told you have no penis?
posted by emily @ Monday, January 16, 2006
3 comments
throckmorton
former location of the long and twisted tale of one girl's awkward journey through misdiagnosis and diagnosis...and right back around to undiagnosis! current location of that same girl's misadventures and rare strokes of genius, and the occasional tale from law school and young lawyerdom.
Monday, January 16, 2006
which is more emasculating, to be told you have a small penis? or to be told you have no penis?
3 Comments:
I would have to agree with Elizabeth as to the emasculation. Small = Bad. Whereas, if you're 'busting' on someone for not having a penis...you're just sexist.
However, emasculation in general isn't what I would call a 'healthy' goal for any conversation, such an attempt generally devolves quickly into the realm of homophobia.
Small penis.
A man told that they have no penis can pretty easily come to the conclusion that the person who has flung such an insult is clearly delusional.
A man told that they have a small penis is less inclined to immediately discount the credibility of such an insult-flinger, and more likely to dwell on the question of whether they do or do not have a small penis.
Voila, more emasculating to be told one has a small penis.
Duh.
Post a Comment
<< Home