church laugh, continued...

here's what tom had to say about yesterday's administrative law class. in case there is any confusion, "mick" is yours truly.

for more fun, here are the notes i took in class:

PROBLEM, page 155 (ha ha - tom got called on)

• Chicken
• (INSERT PICTURE OF BABYCHICKEN HERE)
• (INSERT PICTURE OF CAT WITH CHICKENS HERE)
  
• (INSERT PICTURE OF RUBBER CHICKEN HERE)
  
• (PROFESSOR'S NAME) is totally in his own head. And poor tom. I'm distracting him with chicken pictures. He is entitled to kick my ass.
• Tom has no idea. It's okay, though, because neither do i.
• Be-bopping, scatting...
  
• When the dictionaries differ, which does the congress use?
• GODDAMN YOU, TURD SANDWICH!!!
• (INSERT PICTURE OF LOTS OF CARTOON CHICKENS HERE)
• (INSERT PICTURE OF ROOSTER HERE)
  
• Oh no, now zoolander is talking. He doesn't know, either. He's saying "leg's council" as in "legislature". And he put his laptop down.
• Clear legislative intent that is evident from the language of the statute alone?
• Tom has two reasons for saying no --
• 1, reasonable people can disagree
• 2, doesn't think the problem ends with step 1
• Again with the scatting, be-bopping
• Time for legislative history
• Here's what krista is writing now:
• a;jkldsf
• Af;ljkds
• Iupqoewr
• Zcx.,vm
• Kl'ads;
• Proiqew
• a;jksdf
• Zxm/c,.v
• Afsdj;lkasfd
• Werqjkl;
• Sfkjgl
• Sdpuifo
• ,z.mcxv
• a;dsflkj
• c[vb
• Lhkreqw
• 8729034
• /zx,cv
• Qwjk;rl
• z;xjklvc
• ;lkjfsda
• a;fsdkjl

um, yeah. maybe this is the point where somebody reminds me just how much money i'm paying to be here...